The
Union government informed the Delhi high court on Monday that Twitter has lost
its immunity from criminal prosecution for content on its site due to the
failure to appoint grievance redressal officers as required under the new
Information Technology rules.
Submitting an affidavit in response to a
petition by a lawyer, the government said that Twitter and other social media
intermediaries were given a “sufficient” period of three months time to comply
with the due diligence norm in order to avail of protection from prosecutions
in cases of obnoxious and offensive content posted by a third party.
The Union government said Twitter has
failed to comply with the IT Rules, 2021 for not appointing a Chief Compliance
Officer, Resident Grievance Officer and a Nodal Contact Person even on an
interim basis.
IT Rules, 2021 are the law of the land
and Respondent No 2 (Twitter) is mandatorily required to comply with the same.
Any non-compliance amounts to breach of the provisions of the IT Rules, 2021
thereby leading to Twitter losing its immunity conferred under section 79(1) of
the IT Act, 2000,” the Information and Technology ministry said in an affidavit
filed in the court.
To be sure, this is the IT ministry’s
perspective and it remains to be seen whether Twitter loses the so-called safe
harbour or intermediary immunity for its failure to comply with the rules.
Twitter told the high court on Saturday
that the three months timeline fixed by the Centre to appoint such officers
under the new IT Rules is “directory” but “not mandatory”. The social media
intermediary also told the court that it is in the “final stage” of appointing
officers for grievance redressal.
Twitter has also been summoned by the Ghaziabad police over its role in amplifying a video that allegedly misrepresented an attack on an elderly Muslim man as a hate crime. Under the new digital rules introduced on February 25, social media companies such as Facebook, WhatsApp and Twitter have been asked to place a three-tier grievance redressal system and appoint a chief compliance officer, nodal contact person and resident grievance officer by May 25.
The new rules also require these
companies to identify within 36 hours the originator of a flagged message,
appoint grievance officers , and adopt measures such as tracing of individual
messages and voluntary user verification.
a sufficient period of three months from
Feb 26 was granted to all Significant Social Media Intermediaries (SSMIs) to
comply with the additional due diligence set out under Rule 4 of the IT Rules,
2021. Thus, from May 26 onwards, all SSMIs are mandatorily required to comply
with the obligations set out in Rule 4 of the IT Rules, 2021,” the Centre said.
Under section 79(1) of the IT Rules, all
intermediaries are protected from any criminal prosecution for the content
uploaded by the third party. However, Rule 7 states that when an intermediary
fails to observe the IT Rules, the provisions of section 79 (1) will not be
available and it shall be liable for any punishment under any law for the time
being in force in respect of the offending content.
The Centre told the HC that the immunity
conferred on intermediaries under section 79(1) is a “conditional immunity”
subject to them satisfying the other conditions. “In spite of the three months’
time granted to all (SSMIs) expired on
May 26, Respondent No 2 (Twitter) has failed to comply with the same.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks