The Madras high court has invoked the parens patriae jurisdiction to declare “Mother Nature” as a Living Being with all corresponding rights, duties and liabilities of a living person, in order to preserve and conserve them.
The Madurai bench of the HC in its recent order placed
immense importance on conserving nature, while dealing with a petition from a
former Tahsildar-level official who sought to quash the disciplinary
proceedings against him for allegedly granting patta (land
deed) for government land classified as “Forest Poramboke Land” to certain individuals.
Justice S. Srimathy recalled an earlier judgement of
the Uttarakhand high court, where it had invoked parens
patriae jurisdiction (parent of the nation jurisdiction) and
declared the glaciers including Gangotri and Yamunotri rivers as legal entities
to preserve and conserve them.
She said the past generations have handed over Mother Earth in its
pristine glory and that we are morally bound to hand over the same to the next
generation.
The order said:
“It is right time to declare/confer juristic status to
the “Mother Nature”. Therefore this Court by invoking “parens patriae
jurisdiction” is hereby declaring the “Mother Nature” as a “Living Being”
having legal entity/legal person/juristic person/juridical person/moral
person/artificial person having the status of a legal person, with all
corresponding rights, duties and liabilities of a living person, in order to
preserve and conserve them.”
“They are also accorded the rights akin to fundamental
rights/legal rights/constitutional rights for their survival, safety,
sustenance and resurgence in order to maintain its status and also to promote
their health and wellbeing. The State Government and the Central Government are
directed to protect the Mother Nature and take appropriate steps to protect
Mother Nature in all possible ways,” the court said.
The petitioner, had
prayed for quashing of disciplinary proceedings and direct the respondents to
sanction full pension and death-cum-retirement gratuity (DCRG) to him with
arrears from the date of retirement with 7.5 per cent interest.
The respondents included the Tamil Nadu Principal
Revenue Secretary.
The judge said since the patta granted in respect of
the land in question in Meghamalai was cancelled and the necessary entries made
in the village accounts, “the punishment ought to be modified.”
“Therefore, this Court is of the considered opinion
that the punishment of compulsory retirement ought to be modified as stoppage
of increment for six months without cumulative effect and consequential
monetary benefits shall be conferred on the petitioner.”
“This punishment is imposed for the act done against mother
nature. The respondents are directed to implement this punishment within a
period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order,” the
judge said.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks